Author: Michael Chilov
Editor: Adrian Fung
A 20-year-old man was referred with a central scotoma in his left eye.
A 22-year-old cook was referred by his optometrist complaining of a two-day history of worsening vision in his left eye. He had no previous ophthalmic history and had not seen an optometrist for many years. His past medical history included acne but he was not on any regular treatment. He was a “recreational” smoker. He had not used any corticosteroid medications. He denied any recreational drug use.
Visual acuity was 6/5 in the right eye (OD) and 6/18- in the left eye (OS). There was no relative afferent pupil defect (RAPD). Examination of the left fundus revealed a well demarcated circular area of elevated retina (serous retinal detachment) involving the macula (Figure 1). There were a number of small intraretinal haemorrhages within the area of elevated retina. There was no intraocular inflammation visible, with no cells in the vitreous or anterior chamber. The retinal vasculature was otherwise normal as was the peripheral retina. The right fundus was normal. Intraocular pressures were 14mmHg (OD) and 14 mmHg (OS).
What is your differential diagnosis?
The differential diagnosis for a serous retinal detachment of the macula with retinal haemorrhage includes:
- Choroidal neovascularisation (CNV)
- Following trauma
- Central serous chorioretinopathy
- Unilateral acute idiopathic maculopathy (UAIM)
- Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (VKH)
- Vasculitis/collagen vascular diseases
- Malignant hypertensive retinopathy
Additional history and investigations
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) through the left macula demonstrated subretinal fluid (Figure 2). Hyperreflective deposits were noted on the underside of the detached retina. The choroid was mildly thickened. There was no pigment epithelial detachment (PED) visible.
Fluorescein angiography demonstrated intense hyperfluorescence within the area of the serous retinal detachment (Figure 3). Blocked fluorescence was present in the location of the retinal haemorrhages. No abnormalities were noted outside the area of detached retina. No retinal vascular staining (as might be consistent with retinal vasculitis), or disc staining was seen.
On further questioning the patient reported a recent viral illness with fevers and a sore throat. He also reported painful papules on his hands and feet which had begun to desquamate at the time of presentation (Figure 4). These lesions were consistent with Hand, Foot and Mouth disease and subsequent serology was consistent with acute Coxsackie virus infection.
Acute idiopathic maculopathy (AIM) in association with acute Coxsackie viral infection and Hand, Foot and Mouth disease.
At review two weeks later, vision had returned to 6/9 in the left eye, although the patient still reported disturbance of central vision. Clinically the subretinal fluid had resolved (Figure 5).
At one year follow up. The visual acuity in the left eye was 6/6, although the patient still reported that central vision had not completely returned to premorbid baseline. Colour images and fundus autofluroescence demonstrated retinal pigment epithelial disturbance within the region of the prior serous retinal detachment (Figure 6).
Acute idiopathic maculopathy (AIM) is a rare condition that is characterised by acute severe vision loss often preceded by a flu-like illness. It was first described by Yannuzzi et al. who, in 1991, reported a series of 9 patients with preceding viral illness presenting with sudden severe unilateral vision loss associated with a serous macula detachment.1
Patients are typically young adults who present with acute onset of a central scotoma, often only in one eye but bilateral cases have been described, hence the preferred nomenclature of acute idiopathic maculopathy (AIM) rather than unilateral acute idiopathic maculopathy (UAIM).2
Depending on the time of presentation following disease onset, patients will usually have a serous retinal detachment with an underlying greyish/yellow plaque at the level of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Intraretinal haemorrhages, as in this case, are not uncommon and vitreous cells may be present as well as some disc swelling.1-3 The lesion may appear similar to choroidal neovascularization. Fluorescein angiography demonstrates irregular early hyper- and hypofluorescence followed by late staining. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) demonstrates subretinal fluid and choroidal thickening.2,3
The symptoms usual develop after a viral prodrome of sore throat and fever and has been linked to Coxsackie virus infection3,4. This was the case in this patient where he had signs of Hand, Foot and Mouth disease and Coxsackie viral tires consistent with acute infection. Whether AIM is due to direct viral infection, or an immune related phenomenon triggered by the infection is unclear.3
The disease is characterised by a spontaneous recovery over several weeks with near-complete recovery of vision (most patients have a final vision of greater than 6/7.5)1-3. There has been a single case report of recurrent AIM.5 After resolution of the macular detachment, a lasting ‘‘bull’s-eye’’ pattern composed of RPE hyperpigmentation surrounded by hypopigmented atrophic changes develop at the site of the previous serous retinal detachment.1-3 The OCT demonstrates resolution of the subretinal fluid but variable recovery of the ellipsoid layer (photoreceptors). This longstanding RPE damage can predispose to late choroidal neovascularisation.2
Take home points
- Acute idiopathic maculopathy (AIM) is characterized by acute vision loss in a young adult caused by a serous macular detachment.
- It is often preceded by a flu-like illness and has been linked to Coxsackie virus infection and Hand, Foot and Mouth disease.
- AIM is most commonly unilateral, however, bilateral cases have been reported.
- AIM resolves spontaneously with good visual recovery but a characteristic Bull’s eye retinal pigment epithelial scar remains and can be complicated by choroidal neovascularization (CNV).
- Yannuzzi LA, Jampol LM, Rabb MF et al. Unilateral acute idiopathic maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991; 109(10): 1411-1416.
- Freund KB, Yannuzzi LA, Barile GR et al. The expanding clinical spectrum of unilateral acute idiopathic maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114(5): 555-559.
- Jung CS, Payne JF, Bergstrom CS et al. Multimodal Diagnostic Imaging in Unilateral Acute Idiopathic Maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012; 130(1): 50-6
- Beck AP, Jampol LM, Glaser DA, Pollack JS. Is coxsackie virus the cause of unilateral acute idiopathic maculopathy Arch Ophthalmol. 2004; 122(1): 121-123
- Xu H, Lin P. Unilateral recurrent acute idiopathic maculopathy. Graefes Archive for Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology.2011; 249(6): 941-4.